<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>co&#62;innovative &#187; Collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://coinnovative.com/category/collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://coinnovative.com</link>
	<description>Customer co-design, lead user theory, wisdom of crowds, online marketing, and crowdsourcing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cognitive Surplus: What are you going to do with yours? Clay Shirky explains&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://coinnovative.com/cognitive-surplus-what-are-you-going-to-do-with-yours-clay-shirky-explains/</link>
		<comments>http://coinnovative.com/cognitive-surplus-what-are-you-going-to-do-with-yours-clay-shirky-explains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 05:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Powell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cognitive surplus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coinnovative.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of you might wonder why anyone would participate in many of the activities discussed here or whether it is all sustainable given that they result in little to â€“ more commonly â€“ no money, should ponder what Clay Shirky has to say about what he calls Cognitive Surplus, a concept I just canâ€™t get enough of. <p><a href="http://coinnovative.com/cognitive-surplus-what-are-you-going-to-do-with-yours-clay-shirky-explains/">Cognitive Surplus: What are you going to do with yours? Clay Shirky explains&#8230;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://coinnovative.com">co&gt;innovative</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of you might wonder why anyone participates in many of the activities discussed here or whether it is all sustainable given that they result in little to â€“ more commonly â€“ no money.  Well, you should ponder what Clay Shirky has to say about what he calls Cognitive Surplus, a concept I just canâ€™t get enough of. </p>
<p>(Odd side-note: I spotted Clay Shirky (<a href="http://www.windowsbrooklyn.com/shops_margaret_palca.htm">about half way down the page</a>) among those who participated in a project my girlfriend ran as part of her art collectiveâ€™s <a href="http://www.windowsbrooklyn.com">Windows Brooklyn</a> project last summer.)</p>
<p>In a <a href="httphttp://blip.tv/file/1578141/">video</a> and <a href="http://www.shirky.com/herecomeseverybody/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html#trackback">transcript</a> from last April â€“ yes, it takes me a while to process and write about things at times â€“ Clay lays it out thus:  </p>
<p>A British historian argued that the critical technology in the Industrial Revolution was Gin. The changes were so rapid and disruptive that the British went on a bender for a generation.<br />
<blockquote>â€œAnd it wasn&#8217;t until society woke up from that collective bender that we actually started to get the institutional structures that we associate with the industrial revolution today.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>The Sitcom was the USâ€™ palliative after World War II.  We suddenly found ourselves with free time and disposable income, and we started watching a lot of TV. A lot. </p>
<blockquote><p>â€œAnd it&#8217;s only now, as we&#8217;re waking up from that collective bender, that we&#8217;re starting to see the cognitive surplus as an asset rather than as a crisis. We&#8217;re seeing things being designed to take advantage of that surplus, to deploy it in ways more engaging than just having a TV in everybody&#8217;s basement.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>My favorite part of his thinking: He was talking to a TV journalist about the recent rash of conversation surrounding Plutoâ€™s planetary classification on Wikipedia to which she responded: &#8220;Where do people find the time?&#8221; His response: <em><strong><br />
<blockquote>&#8220;No one who works in TV gets to ask that question. You know where the time comes from. It comes from the cognitive surplus you&#8217;ve been masking for 50 years.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p></strong></em> He estimates we expend </p>
<blockquote><p>â€œAbout 2,000 Wikipedia projects a year â€¦ watching televisionâ€¦ I can tell you from personal experience it&#8217;s worse to sit in your basement and try to figure if Ginger or Mary Ann is cuter.  I&#8217;m willing to raise that to a general principle. It&#8217;s better to do something than to do nothing. </p></blockquote>
<p>Thus, the free time and brain time outside of work remains, the question is what percentage of it will be occupied by the completely unproductive versus the semi- and extremely productive?  An example of a successful use of brain time, in this case for the common good, comes from <a href="http://mass-customization.blogs.com/mass_customization_open_i/2008/12/crowdsourcing-for-a-good-cause-how-innocentives-utilized-an-untapped-pool-of-altruism-to-work-on-non.html">InnoCentive where about 20% of their projects are non-profit</a>.  Uncompensated. Using peopleâ€™s free time.  </p>
<p>Going forward, the big thing will be experimenting and figuring out what works in collective work and production.  As I have covered here, experiments abound, some successful, many not.  There is a long way to go, but as Clay says, this is not something society will grow out of, but something society will grow into.  </p>
<p>Cognitive Surplus. Love it.
<p><font color="#B4B4B4" size="-2">Post Footer automatically generated by <a href="http://www.freetimefoto.com/add_post_footer_plugin_wordpress" style="color: #B4B4B4; text-decoration:underline;">Add Post Footer Plugin</a> for wordpress.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://coinnovative.com/cognitive-surplus-what-are-you-going-to-do-with-yours-clay-shirky-explains/">Cognitive Surplus: What are you going to do with yours? Clay Shirky explains&#8230;</a> is a post from: <a href="http://coinnovative.com">co&gt;innovative</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coinnovative.com/cognitive-surplus-what-are-you-going-to-do-with-yours-clay-shirky-explains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Part 8: Collaborative Content Creation; or, Crowdsourcing your way to creativity</title>
		<link>http://coinnovative.com/part-8-collaborative-content-creation-or-crowdsourcing-your-way-to-creativity/</link>
		<comments>http://coinnovative.com/part-8-collaborative-content-creation-or-crowdsourcing-your-way-to-creativity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Powell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisdom of Crowds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creativity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://coinnovative.com/?p=222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crowdsourcing or collaboratively creating content of any kind becomes dicey very quickly and the odds of creating something greater than the sum of its parts are low.  In fact, creating by committee generally leads to utter crap.  (When was the last time you read and enjoyed a story written line by line by contributors?)  But with collaborative sites and, in my view, a talented orchestrator, it might be possible to create something of quality or, at least, facilitate an interesting experience, regardless of the end product. <p><a href="http://coinnovative.com/part-8-collaborative-content-creation-or-crowdsourcing-your-way-to-creativity/">Part 8: Collaborative Content Creation; or, Crowdsourcing your way to creativity</a> is a post from: <a href="http://coinnovative.com">co&gt;innovative</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crowdsourcing or collaboratively creating content of any kind becomes dicey very quickly and the odds of creating something greater than the sum of its parts are low.  In fact, creating by committee generally leads to utter crap.  (When was the last time you read and enjoyed a story written line by line by contributors?)  But with collaborative sites and, in my view, a talented orchestrator, it might be possible to create something of quality or, at least, facilitate an interesting experience, regardless of the end product.  Wikipedia has been talked to death as what is likely the greatest implementation of collaborative content creation in history but few projects have risen above the level of a chaotic mess. </p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Collaborative (or crowdsourced) content creation</strong>: A group effort to contribute to and edit portions of content for the expressed aim of producing a specific overarching project.</p></blockquote>
<p><img src="http://coinnovative.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/aswarmofangels-300x213.jpg" alt="A Swarm of Angels" width="300" height="213" class="size-medium wp-image-224" />For some reason, examples of collaborative creativity keep popping up in the film-making arena.  <a href="http://www.itsourmovie.com/">It&#8217;s Our Movie</a> began with a script and a director (Alex Jovy, an Oscar Nominated Producer) and used the community to find its actors.  (While this may not technically fall under &#8220;content creation&#8221;, it does bring a community into the overall creative process of a film.)  Anyone could upload an audition for one of the characters and then the best were voted up.   <a href="http://aswarmofangels.com/">A Swarm Of Angels</a> was a more ambitious project in which everything from the concept to script, casting to funding was created by the crowd. (It was up and running for several years but now the website is under construction, status unclear.) </p>
<p><a href="http://www.cowritescript.com/">CoWrite</a> is essentially a script writing competition in 10 page increments.  Each week anyone can enter a submission (along with $10) and, each week, the best entry is awarded $3,000 by an internal panel of judges and becomes the next 10 pages of the script.  The final script will then be rewritten by one of the weekly winners who will be paid $5K.  Another perk of winning is a meeting with Benderspink (Production company behin American Pie, A History of Violence) who will also review the final script and decide what to do with it from there. </p>
<p>Assignment Zero, a project sparked by Jeff Howe who coined &#8220;crowdsourcing&#8221; and Jay Rosen, began with the goal of having &#8220;a crowd of volunteers write the definitive report on how crowds of volunteers are upending established businesses, from software to encyclopedias and beyond.&#8221; Jeff Howe considered it &#8220;<a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2007/07/assignment_zero_final">a highly satisfying failure</a>&#8220;. </p>
<p>In some cases, the experience of contributing itself becomes the purpose of a project, not what is produced in the end. Contributing a sentence to a growing story can be enjoyable and creatively inspiring regardless of the poor end result of the totality of the project.  And, as creative types know, most of what you produce, regardless of your brilliance and success, will be poor.  </p>
<p>Any other examples I&#8217;ve missed? </p>
<p><a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">Wikipedia</a><br />
<a href="http://aswarmofangels.com/">A Swarm of Angels</a><br />
<a href="http://www.itsourmovie.com/">It&#8217;s Our Movie</a> (The movie is in production as of winter 08/09.)<br />
<a href="http://www.zefrank.com/">Ze Frank</a> The great and noble Ze Frank who has called on his community to write, draw, execute power moves, and make earth sandwiches in order to create works of art and entertainment and bring joy to the downtrodden&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2007/07/assignment_zero_final">Assignment Zero</a><br />
<a href="http://www.protagonize.com/">Protagonize</a>  supports &#8220;addventure&#8221; which is collaborative writing in which people can branch stories off into new paths<br />
<a href="http://www.nowpublic.com/culture/spike-lee-direct-crowdsourced-mobile-phone-movie ">Spike Lee Nokia  Ad</a> </p>
<p>Read the rest of the <a href="http://coinnovative.com/crowdsourcing-article-series/">Crowdsourcing article series</a>.
<p><font color="#B4B4B4" size="-2">Post Footer automatically generated by <a href="http://www.freetimefoto.com/add_post_footer_plugin_wordpress" style="color: #B4B4B4; text-decoration:underline;">Add Post Footer Plugin</a> for wordpress.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://coinnovative.com/part-8-collaborative-content-creation-or-crowdsourcing-your-way-to-creativity/">Part 8: Collaborative Content Creation; or, Crowdsourcing your way to creativity</a> is a post from: <a href="http://coinnovative.com">co&gt;innovative</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://coinnovative.com/part-8-collaborative-content-creation-or-crowdsourcing-your-way-to-creativity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>


